Using Deltix for Trading Cryptocurrencies and Bitcoin Futures

Bitcoin: New Asset Class or Latest Bubble?

The surge in both the price and corresponding interest in trading cryptocurrencies including bitcoin has been one of the main stories in the financial markets during 2017. Historians may point to the launch of bitcoin futures by the CME and CBOE exchanges as the turning point in the acceptance of cryptocurrencies as “institutional” with the ability for trading firms, in addition to trading “spot crypto”, to gain exposure (long and short) to cryptocurrencies (specifically bitcoin) within the safety of regulated futures exchanges.

Far be it for us to predict whether cryptocurrencies are a new asset class or bubble, but the native architecture of the Deltix Product Suite has made it straightforward for us to provide research and trading capabilities for cryptocurrencies.

This means that Deltix clients can now bring best-in-class institutional quantitative analysis and trading (manual and automated) capabilities to cryptocurrencies and their new derivatives (futures).

Crypto Connectivity

Deltix has built data and trading adapters for several bitcoin venues, such as GDAX, Bitfinex and Gemini. This is an ongoing process with new venues being added weekly. Because these venues are so new, many do not have the technology sophistication that institutional traders enjoy at traditional stock and futures exchanges and forex venues.

Deltix aggregates raw order book data from these cryptocurrency venues and has “normalized” connectivity to these venues. As such, users interact directly with the Deltix software (whether for manual or automated trading) rather than navigate the still-evolving technology of crypto trading venues.

In addition to streaming real-time data from each connected venue, crypto tick data is also stored in TimeBase thereby creating an archive of historical data for subsequent analysis. By providing this capability for multiple venues simultaneously, differences in quotes between venues can be analyzed to better understand market structure and enable institutional grade alpha generation and execution management.

Trading Cryptocurrencies and Bitcoin Futures

For trading, the full capabilities of Deltix StrategyServer and ExecutionServer are available: including trading risk checks, position keeping, profit and loss tracking and resilient connectivity.

Consistent with Deltix capabilities with other asset classes, users can trade manually via our TradingConsole or deploy automated trading strategies developed and back-tested in QuantOffice. The Deltix automated trading platform provides latency measures in micro-seconds. Users wishing to bring their own analytics to bear can take advantage of Deltix’ extensive APIs for C#, C++, Java and Python.

For more information on how you can use the Deltix platform for trading cryptocurrencies and bitcoin futures, please contact us.

 

Advantages Of Recording Your Own Market Data

Recently, Deltix was spotlighted in two industry publications – CTA Intelligence and e-FOREX. Below are synopses of the two articles and links to view the original articles (no subscription or login needed).

DIY Execution Analysis

The CTA Intelligence Special Report: Managed Futures 2016 included an article by Stuart Farr titled “DIY Execution Analysis.” In the article, Stuart talks about the high cost and potentially undesirable characteristics of purchasing historical market data versus recording your own market data. Unless you’re running a start-up firm, it’s better to record real time market data for use in back-testing and execution analysis (or TCA).

The article discusses multiple advantages of recording your own market data. For example:

  • You can capture all of the latencies and idiosyncrasies inherent in your own infrastructure and market data feeds. This is most important for strategies or analysis (like execution quality) that require tick and market depth data.
  • If you’re doing forensic execution analysis, it is doubly necessary as the time-stamping of orders, executions and market data needs to be fully sequenced. Such forensic execution analysis may not be required on a continuous basis, but is essential when there is an unexpected or unexplained change in execution quality.
  • For orders executed algorithmically, ongoing analysis is useful to track performance of the algos. Analysis can provide comfort or alert to unacceptable changes in execution quality measured in both ticks and dollar value. Time-series analysis of executions can be used to look for patterns of over/under performance and improve execution algo selection and parameterization.
  • A practical key to success is to demonstrably and frequently improve trading performance by fine-tuning execution. There is nothing like showing real dollar improvement to keep researchers, technologists and traders motivated and focused.

Stuart goes into detail about each of these points. You can access the article here (no registration or login required).

Strategy Back Testing Platforms

e-FOREX published an article, “Sharpening the tools of the trade: New Developments with FX Strategy Back Testing Platforms”, that features comments from Ilya Gorelik on the topic of back testing foreign exchange (FX) trading strategies. This article talks about the challenges in signal generation and back testing in FX and how new technologies (e.g. cloud) can assist.

The subject of the e-FOREX article is back-testing only. As Deltix clients already appreciate, it is extremely important to be able to deploy a backtested trading strategy “as is” with no re-coding. This helps to protect the fidelity of actual results versus back-tested results. It also reduces time-to-market and the overall cost of the strategy development and deployment process. Deltix is the only institutional grade platform that provides this full, research-to-live-deployment capability.

You can read this article here (no registration or login required).

The Deltix Product Suite provides end-to-end support of all phases of the alpha discovery process, including data collection and aggregation, model development, back-testing, simulation and deployment to production. Learn more here.

Can You Generate Alpha in US Equities Using Corporate Reputation?

Corporate Reputation Data

The Corporate Reputation Index (CRI), developed by Seldonix and distributed in partnership with Social Market Analytics, allows traders to identify and compare over- and under-priced stocks that are affected by a company’s actions. Corporate Reputation is the controllable portion of a company’s stock price, considered to be an intrinsic driver of company performance, and a major contributor to daily stock price fluctuation.

The Corporate Reputation Index is the first daily business metric for monitoring corporate reputation. Centered on “0”, companies with negative values are deemed undervalued relative to market while those with positive values are overvalued.

The CRI is created after the close of markets and is currently available before markets open the next day at any time after 9:00 PM Eastern US Time the night before.

Each data record features a set of fields:

  • The timestamp associated with each field is the market close date of the data used;
  • Symbol;
  • CRI

Basis of Research using Seldonix data

The purpose of the research described in this paper is to determine if there are opportunities to generate alpha in US equities traded on the NYSE and NASDAQ using Seldonix data as a basis for daily market movement prediction (the holding period is about 6.5 hours).

We show how with the use of simple technical indicators and the popular conception of basket trading, we can exploit the CRI to generate excess returns. An evaluation of the CRI was conducted in the forecasting of stock price. The results of the testing showed a 1 – 8 day lag in the prediction of stock price, depending on the stock. Therefore our purpose is to determine the most appropriate time when the CRI generates the most suitable values for opening a position. As the CRI values change every day and are different for each ticker, we need to construct an approach which will successfully encompass both equally important collations. To identify these situations, we need to:

  • Compare short-term values to long-term;
  • Compare values within the considered universe of tickers.

The full paper can be accessed here.

Results

This approach gives the following results for S&P 100 tested on the period from 1/5/2010 to 8/18/2014:

ParameterAll TradesLong TradesShort Trades
Net Profit/Loss21,182.8213,984.977,197.85
Total Profit113,708.7159,129.8054,578.91
Total Loss-92,525.89-45,144.83-47,381.06
Cumulated Profit %21.18 %13.98 %7.20 %

Max Drawdown-2,590.71-2,774.62-2,265.55
Max Drawdown %-2.41 %-2.66 %-2.18 %
Max Drawdown Date9/2/20119/30/20119/15/2011
Return/Drawdown Ratio8.185.043.18
Drawdown Days %80.96 %80.36 %88.29 %
Max Drawdown Duration119198188

CAGR4.40 %2.97 %1.57 %
Sharpe Ratio1.731.370.73
Annualized Volatility2.542.162.15
Sortino Ratio2.862.151.13
UPI0.390.270.13
Information Ratio1.711.370.72
Optimal f68.3263.5133.96

All Trades #230811661142
Profitable Trades Ratio0.530.540.52
Winning Trades #1229634595
Losing Trades #1079532547

Average Trade9.1811.996.30
Average Winning Trade92.5293.2691.73
Average Losing Trade-85.75-84.86-86.62
Avg. Win/ Avg. Loss Ratio1.081.101.06
Average Profit per Share0.040.050.03

Max Consequent Winners  9119
Max Consequent Losers10109

 

Rules for closing

The other idea is to exploit the CR trend not only for opening but for closing position. On the figure below you can see the example of position on AAPL chart, blue line on second pad indicates CRI values:

We use the Simple Moving Average (SMA) of the last CRI values (red line on the second pad) to determine whether the instrument gets over or underpriced. Using the model from the paragraph Over/Under Priced, we will close the position for the instrument according to following rule:

  1. If CR > SMA (5, CR) (instrument is overpriced at time t, price is likely to return to suggested price at t+1) close Short position on day close;
  2. If CR < SMA (5, CR) (instrument is underpriced at time t, price is likely to return to suggested price at t+1) close Long position on day close.

The same chart with this rule shows better results:

This approach gives the following results for S&P100 tested on the period from 1/5/2010 to 8/18/2014:

ParameterAll TradesLong TradesShort Trades
Net Profit/Loss32,118.4918,265.4113,853.08
Total Profit143,984.7571,784.7972,199.96
Total Loss-111,866.26-53,519.38-58,346.88
Cumulated Profit %32.12 %18.27 %13.85 %

Max Drawdown-3,526.80-4,508.75-3,368.95
Max Drawdown %-3.08 %-4.22 %-3.07 %
Max Drawdown Date9/2/20119/30/20119/15/2011
Return/Drawdown Ratio9.114.054.11
Drawdown Days %80.45 %81.83 %88.63 %
Max Drawdown Duration95194279

CAGR6.44 %3.83 %2.95 %
Sharpe Ratio1.971.310.94
Annualized Volatility3.272.933.14
Sortino Ratio3.402.061.55
UPI0.580.260.19
Information Ratio1.901.310.91
Optimal f60.0544.6329.93

All Trades #219011031087
Profitable Trades Ratio0.530.550.51
Winning Trades #1158603555
Losing Trades #1032500532

Average Trade14.6716.5612.74
Average Winning Trade124.34119.05130.09
Average Losing Trade-108.40-107.04-109.67
Avg. Win/ Avg. Loss Ratio1.151.111.19
Average Profit per Share0.060.070.05

Max Consequent Winners131616
Max Consequent Losers11915

 

Filter for stronger signal

One more idea is to filter a stronger signal when CR retains its sign from the previous day, which is a stronger signal indicating overpriced/ underpriced asset. On the chart below you can see two trades on MSFT asset, the second one is unprofitable, when the CR line changes its value from -1 to 1:

Filtering out such unstable situations gets the following results for the S&P 100 tested in the period from 1/5/2010 to 8/18/2014:

ParameterAll TradesLong TradesShort Trades
Net Profit/Loss32,810.1219,145.4513,664.67
Total Profit126,322.9964,003.7262,319.27
Total Loss-93,512.87-44,858.26-48,654.61
Cumulated Profit %32.81 %19.15 %13.66 %

Max Drawdown-2,617.49-4,409.37-2,465.16
Max Drawdown %-2.37 %-4.18 %-2.29 %
Max Drawdown Date9/2/20119/30/20119/15/2011
Return/Drawdown Ratio12.534.345.54
Drawdown Days %78.38 %80.02 %86.74 %
Max Drawdown Duration89194176

CAGR6.56 %4.00 %2.91 %
Sharpe Ratio2.161.491.03
Annualized Volatility3.042.682.84
Sortino Ratio3.822.451.70
UPI0.670.260.24
Information Ratio2.111.501.01
Optimal f70.8055.5136.20

All Trades #1839937902
Profitable Trades Ratio0.530.550.51
Winning Trades #972512460
Losing Trades #867425442

Average Trade17.8420.4315.15
Average Winning Trade129.96125.01135.48
Average Losing Trade-107.86-105.55-110.08
Avg. Win/ Avg. Loss Ratio1.201.181.23
Average Profit per Share0.070.080.06

Max Consequent Winners121211
Max Consequent Losers111016

 

Conclusion

We presented an approach that uses CR indices as a strong predictive factor of price directionality. We developed a trading strategy that implements an algorithm based on this approach. We also constructed two other versions, both based on CRI predictive power, that raise the performance of the main approach.

The main contribution of the paper is back-testing and comparison of the different versions of the strategy. On stocks in the S&P 100, back-testing shows that the first strategy has an average Information Ratio of 1.71 over the period 2010-2014, the second and third versions achieved Information Ratios of 1.90 and 2.11 respectively, which indicates that the CRI is predictive in the forecasting of stock returns.

Can You Generate Alpha in US Equities Using Crowd Sourced Earnings Data?

By: The Deltix Quantitative Research Team

Introduction

This paper describes the implementation of an automated equity trading strategy based on aggregated company earnings estimates from independent, buy-side, and sell-side analysts, along with those of private investors and students. By sourcing estimates from a diverse community of individuals (“crowd-sourcing”), Estimize provides an alternative view of earnings expectations compared to traditional sell-side analysts.

We implemented the strategy in the Deltix QuantOffice research platform, a purpose-built C# development studio with embedded math, statistics and data libraries.

Estimize Data

The Estimize data used in this research is a set of earnings per share (EPS) estimates. Each data record refers to a certain EPS announcement which is made for a stock every quarter. The data record features a set of fields:

–        Instrument type;

–        Creation time;

–        Estimate_id;

–        Released_id;

–        EPS forecast;

–        Revenue forecast;

–        Date of the release.

 

A sample of the Estimize data as represented in Deltix QuantOffice is shown below.


 

Basis of Research using Estimize data

The purpose of the research described in this paper is to determine if there are opportunities to generate alpha in US equities, using Estimize data as a basis for overnight market movement prediction (the holding period is about 19 hours). We show how with simple mathematical techniques, we can identify pricing inefficiencies which we can exploit to generate excess returns. We take the theory of stock market overreaction as a basis for our model. A consequence of overreaction is the possible profitability of a contrarian strategy, that is, a strategy that exploits negative serial dependence in asset returns. The defining characteristic of a contrarian strategy is the purchase of securities that have performed poorly in the past and the sale of securities that have performed well. Such “selling the winners” and “buying the losers” may earn positive returns because current losers are likely to become future winners and current winners are likely to become future losers when stock returns are negatively autocorrelated. Therefore, it may be said that an implication of stock market overreaction is positive expected profits from a contrarian investment strategy.

This research analyzes how Estimize forecasts change over the period preceding the announcement by a company of its earnings (reporting period). The directionality in estimates can serve as an indicator for “winners” and “losers”. We determine if the short term estimates are more optimistic or pessimistic than the long term ones to predict the change of price after the announcement.

As a start, let us determine which estimates should be considered as short term. To do this, the average number of estimates per reporting period for a ticker universe of the S&P100 is calculated. The results are shown below.

Ticker

Number

Ticker

Number

Ticker

Number

AAPL

186.57

MON

10.43

BMY

4.13

GOOG

70.62

HON

10.33

FCX

4.00

AMZN

53.10

JNJ

9.64

APC

3.88

NKE

40.22

CVS

9.23

MET

3.80

SBUX

33.00

WMT

9.15

UNP

3.78

EBAY

32.85

PG

9.00

WAG

3.67

INTC

30.46

FDX

8.50

RTN

3.43

DIS

28.00

CL

7.50

UPS

3.43

JPM

27.56

UNH

7.50

LLY

3.36

CSCO

25.91

AIG

7.44

AEP

3.33

IBM

24.85

MRK

7.25

DOW

3.00

F

24.45

GILD

7.11

NOV

2.75

MSFT

22.92

ABT

6.78

NSC

2.75

V

22.64

HAL

6.67

MDT

2.67

ORCL

21.30

AMGN

6.63

SO

2.67

QCOM

19.83

BAX

6.57

MMM

2.63

HPQ

19.73

EMR

6.57

MDLZ

2.33

MA

18.38

PEP

6.50

UTX

2.33

HD

17.36

BA

6.44

DVN

2.25

DELL

16.71

T

6.44

EXC

2.25

EMC

16.25

LMT

6.29

COF

2.09

WFC

16.00

CVX

6.09

COP

2.00

LOW

15.88

MS

5.83

MO

2.00

GS

15.62

PFE

5.50

OXY

2.00

TGT

14.56

VZ

5.13

BK

1.88

COST

13.82

TWX

5.00

APA

1.75

TXN

13.77

SLB

4.78

PM

1.50

BAC

13.58

AXP

4.69

WMB

1.00

C

13.00

USB

4.50

ALL

0.00

MCD

13.00

XOM

4.40

BRK.B

0.00

CAT

11.31

DD

4.25

SPG

0.00

GE

11.11

ACN

4.22

KO

10.64

GD

4.20

 

The mean value is 12.5 estimates per reporting period. To designate estimates as a short term, we need to balance between having too large a number of estimates (which may increase imprecision) and too small a number (which may be unrepresentative). Therefore, we expect that the boundary between these short term and long term estimates should be a particular quintile, q, of estimates:

In our implementation q= 0.2, which means that for 100 estimates, we take the mean value of the last 20 as the short term forecast.

To measure the predictive power of this approach we need to collect the estimates prior to the last reporting date and calculate the mean estimate which is our long term forecast:

The last estimate in this summation is at the day close prior to the report.

Similarly, the short term forecast is:

Trading Hypothesis

Our hypothesis is that relatively higher optimism in the short term forecast compared to the long-term forecast usually leads to negative price movement after the actual earnings announcement. In this case, the announcement will probably miss the short term expectation, and the stock price will fall. On the other hand, where long term optimism is followed by short term, pre-announcement, pessimism then this predicts positive stock price movement.

Trading Algorithm

To implement this hypothesis as an automated trading strategy we need to:

1)     Collect the earnings estimates until the day close prior to the earnings announcement and calculate the mean estimate:

meanEPS = sumEPS/EPScount;

 

2)     Calculate the mean of last q values:

k  = Floor(EPScount*q);

meanEPS_q = sumEPS_k/k;

 

3)     Calculate the difference between long and short term forecast, i.e. the difference between the mean Estimize consensus pre-report and mean Estimize consensus of the last 20% values:

 

delta = meanEPS – meanEPS_q;

 

4)     Open position prior to the EPS announcement in accordance with ∆.

 if (delta < 0) goShort; else goLong;

 

5)     Close position on next day open.

In the strategy, we open the position at 15:59 and close the position at 09:35 next day. Through testing, we determined that opening position at the closing auction price has no significant impact on performance.

 

Market Neutrality

We tested strategy performance using dollar (notional) and beta (market) neutral approaches with the goal of creating a portfolio uncorrelated with the movement of the market, i.e. to determine that this Estimize-based strategy generates true alpha.

 

1)     Dollar-neutral:

The portfolio is hedged using the S&P 500 index via the SPY. We calculate the dollar amount of all opened positions at 15:59 and open the opposite position in SPY. If the dollar amounts invested in each of the stocks are  , then we invest in SPY:  

 

 2)     Beta-neutral:

We performed a regression of stock returns on the SPY return over a period of 250 days:

 

Where denotes the daily return of a stock i or SPY index respectively, R = log(CurrentDayClose/prevDayClose). We used Ordinary Least Squares method to estimate betas for each stock.

If the dollar amounts invested in each of the stocks are , then the dollar amount invested in SPY is such that:

 

which keeps the overall portfolio beta-neutral.

These variations of the algorithm are available via strategy input parameters, in QuantOffice.


Consolidated Report

The strategy was run on securities:

1) S&P100;

2) 100 companies from S&P500 with the greatest turnover;

3) 200 companies from S&P500 with the greatest turnover.

Back-testing period: from 12/26/2011 to 12/31/2013.

 

 

S&P100

100 companies from S&P500 

200 companies from S&P500 

Strategy

Stocks

Dollar neutral

Beta neutral

Stocks

Dollar neutral

Beta neutral

Stocks

Dollar neutral

Beta neutral

Net Profit/Loss

22,903.79

18,235.72

17,099.26

28,831.43

24,290.54

21,602.58

42,221.01

34,195.22

28,497.21

Total Profit

88,561.18

92,850.19

88,344.25

121,216.22

125,820.11

121,110.75

211,465.74

219,339.25

207,103.44

Total Loss

-65,657.39

-74,614.47

-71,244.99

-92,384.79

-101,529.57

-99,508.17

-169,244.74

-185,144.03

-178,606.22

Cumulated Profit %

22.90 %

18.24 %

17.10 %

28.83 %

24.29 %

21.60 %

42.22 %

34.20 %

28.50 %

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Max Drawdown

-4,050.98

-4,064.70

-4,130.32

-6,097.02

-6,023.01

-5,886.81

-6,847.01

-6,567.76

-6,992.91

Max Drawdown %

-3.44 %

-3.54 %

-3.62 %

-4.80 %

-4.84 %

-4.82 %

-4.87 %

-4.73 %

-5.23 %

Max Drawdown Time

1/28/2013

1/28/2013

1/28/2013

1/23/2013

1/23/2013

1/23/2013

3/19/2013

11/27/2013

11/29/2013

Return/Drawdown Ratio

5.65

4.49

4.14

4.73

4.03

3.67

6.17

5.21

4.08

Drawdown Days %

69.17 %

72.33 %

48.17 %

72.33 %

72.92 %

49.12 %

80.43 %

82.61 %

55.37 %

Max Drawdown Duration

81

81

81

137

139

139

78

133

133

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CAGR

11.18 %

8.99 %

5.71 %

13.90 %

11.82 %

7.12 %

19.84 %

16.31 %

9.27 %

Sharpe Ratio

2.08

1.72

1.36

2.12

1.83

1.33

2.19

1.88

1.33

Sortino Ratio

5.38

5.22

4.20

6.56

6.47

5.34

9.06

8.66

6.99

UPI

3.43

2.74

2.16

3.77

3.13

2.26

3.90

3.14

2.14

Annualized Volatility

0.72

0.54

0.40

0.65

0.46

0.32

0.64

0.46

0.30

Information Ratio

1.93

1.62

1.29

1.88

1.63

1.22

1.87

1.62

1.18

Optimal f

38.65

33.01

32.41

32.33

28.21

24.98

24.20

21.77

19.01

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

All Trades #

603

784

771

657

838

823

1148

1389

1344

Profitable Trades Ratio

0.54

0.52

0.52

0.54

0.52

0.52

0.53

0.52

0.52

Winning Trades #

328

409

401

355

433

425

607

718

693

Losing Trades #

275

375

370

302

405

398

541

671

651

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average Trade

37.98

23.26

22.18

43.88

28.99

26.25

36.78

24.62

21.20

Average Winning Trade

270.00

227.02

220.31

341.45

290.58

284.97

348.38

305.49

298.85

Average Losing Trade

-238.75

-198.97

-192.55

-305.91

-250.69

-250.02

-312.84

-275.92

-274.36

Avg. Win/ Avg. Loss Ratio

1.13

1.14

1.14

1.12

1.16

1.14

1.11

1.11

1.09

Average Profit per Share

0.17

0.12

0.11

0.19

0.14

0.13

0.15

0.11

0.09

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Max Conseq. Winners

8

10

10

7

8

7

10

8

7

Max Conseq. Losers

6

6

7

9

7

7

8

8

8

 

Conclusion

We presented an approach that measures the relative optimism or pessimism of short term versus long term Estimize estimates as a strong predictive factor of the price directionality after EPS announcements. We developed a trading strategy that implements an algorithm based on this approach. We also constructed dollar-neutral and beta-neutral portfolios to demonstrate that the achieved effect is uncorrelated with the market.

The main contribution of the paper is back-testing and comparison of the unhedged strategy with dollar-neutral and beta-neutral ones. On stocks in the S&P100, back-testing shows that the unhedged strategy has an Information ratio of 1.93 over the period 2012-2013, with a stronger performance in 2012. Dollar-neutral and beta-neutral strategies achieved Information Ratios of 1.62 and 1.29 respectively, which indicates that the strategy does generate alpha.

 

 

 

Appendix A: Detailed Reports

Only S&P100 stocks:

Net Profit/Loss

22,903.79

13,834.76

9,069.03

Total Profit

88,561.18

58,373.43

30,187.75

Total Loss

-65,657.39

-44,538.67

-21,118.72

Cumulated Profit %

22.90 %

13.83 %

9.07 %

Max Drawdown

-4,050.98

-2,535.09

-2,528.59

Max Drawdown %

-3.44 %

-2.28 %

-2.32 %

Max Drawdown Date

1/28/2013

1/24/2013

7/31/2013

Return/Drawdown Ratio

5.65

5.46

3.59

Drawdown Days %

69.17 %

78.26 %

73.91 %

Max Drawdown Duration

81

83

137

CAGR

11.18 %

6.88 %

4.56 %

Sharpe Ratio

2.08

1.49

1.33

Annualized Volatility

5.38

4.62

3.43

Sortino Ratio

3.43

2.43

2.32

UPI

0.72

0.52

0.34

Information Ratio

1.93

1.42

1.29

Optimal f

38.65

32.26

38.88

All Trades #

603

441

162

Profitable Trades Ratio

0.54

0.54

0.56

Winning Trades #

328

238

90

Losing Trades #

275

203

72

Average Trade

37.98

31.37

55.98

Average Winning Trade

270.00

245.27

335.42

Average Losing Trade

-238.75

-219.40

-293.32

Avg. Win/ Avg. Loss Ratio

1.13

1.12

1.14

Average Profit per Share

0.17

0.15

0.23

Max Conseq. Winners

8

7

7

Max Conseq. Losers

6

6

5

Hedged by SPY S&P100 stocks:

 

Net Profit/Loss

18,235.72

13,519.25

4,716.47

Total Profit

92,850.19

58,917.72

33,932.47

Total Loss

-74,614.47

-45,398.47

-29,216.00

Cumulated Profit %

18.24 %

13.52 %

4.72 %

Max Drawdown

-4,064.70

-2,553.26

-3,319.65

Max Drawdown %

-3.54 %

-2.30 %

-3.13 %

Max Drawdown Date

1/28/2013

1/24/2013

8/1/2013

Return/Drawdown Ratio

4.49

5.29

1.42

Drawdown Days %

72.33 %

83.79 %

90.91 %

Max Drawdown Duration

81

107

169

CAGR

8.99 %

6.73 %

2.40 %

Sharpe Ratio

1.72

1.45

0.63

Annualized Volatility

5.22

4.63

3.80

Sortino Ratio

2.74

2.37

0.99

UPI

0.54

0.50

0.12

Information Ratio

1.62

1.39

0.62

Optimal f

33.01

31.44

16.63

All Trades #

784

483

301

Profitable Trades Ratio

0.52

0.53

0.50

Winning Trades #

409

257

152

Losing Trades #

375

226

149

Average Trade

23.26

27.99

15.67

Average Winning Trade

227.02

229.25

223.24

Average Losing Trade

-198.97

-200.88

-196.08

Avg. Win/ Avg. Loss Ratio

1.14

1.14

1.14

Average Profit per Share

0.12

0.14

0.08

Max Conseq. Winners

10

7

6

Max Conseq. Losers

6

6

8

 

 

Beta neutral S&P100 stocks:

Net Profit/Loss

17,099.26

13,140.04

3,959.22

Total Profit

88,344.25

55,753.20

32,591.05

Total Loss

-71,244.99

-42,613.16

-28,631.83

Cumulated Profit %

17.10 %

13.14 %

3.96 %

Max Drawdown

-4,130.32

-2,589.82

-3,407.28

Max Drawdown %

-3.62 %

-2.34 %

-3.24 %

Max Drawdown Date

1/28/2013

1/24/2013

8/1/2013

Return/Drawdown Ratio

4.14

5.07

1.16

Drawdown Days %

48.17 %

54.53 %

60.76 %

Max Drawdown Duration

81

129

169

CAGR

5.71 %

4.44 %

1.38 %

Sharpe Ratio

1.36

1.20

0.44

Annualized Volatility

4.20

3.71

3.13

Sortino Ratio

2.16

1.93

0.67

UPI

0.40

0.39

0.08

Information Ratio

1.29

1.15

0.44

Optimal f

32.41

32.23

14.08

All Trades #

771

469

302

Profitable Trades Ratio

0.52

0.54

0.49

Winning Trades #

401

253

148

Losing Trades #

370

216

154

Average Trade

22.18

28.02

13.11

Average Winning Trade

220.31

220.37

220.21

Average Losing Trade

-192.55

-197.28

-185.92

Avg. Win/ Avg. Loss Ratio

1.14

1.12

1.18

Average Profit per Share

0.11

0.15

0.07

Max Conseq. Winners

10

7

6

Max Conseq. Losers

7

6

6

 

Only 100 stocks from S&P500:

Net Profit/Loss

28,831.43

23,711.21

5,120.22

Total Profit

121,216.22

80,130.00

41,086.22

Total Loss

-92,384.79

-56,418.79

-35,966.00

Cumulated Profit %

28.83 %

23.71 %

5.12 %

Max Drawdown

-6,097.02

-3,303.87

-5,767.64

Max Drawdown %

-4.80 %

-2.60 %

-5.24 %

Max Drawdown Date

1/23/2013

12/20/2013

5/21/2013

Return/Drawdown Ratio

4.73

7.18

0.89

Drawdown Days %

72.33 %

65.42 %

78.46 %

Max Drawdown Duration

137

97

301

CAGR

13.90 %

11.55 %

2.60 %

Sharpe Ratio

2.12

2.17

0.57

Annualized Volatility

6.56

5.32

4.59

Sortino Ratio

3.77

4.18

0.87

UPI

0.65

0.83

0.05

Information Ratio

1.88

1.98

0.54

Optimal f

32.33

40.79

12.33

All Trades #

657

451

206

Profitable Trades Ratio

0.54

0.55

0.52

Winning Trades #

355

247

108

Losing Trades #

302

204

98

Average Trade

43.88

52.57

24.86

Average Winning Trade

341.45

324.41

380.43

Average Losing Trade

-305.91

-276.56

-367.00

Avg. Win/ Avg. Loss Ratio

1.12

1.17

1.04

Average Profit per Share

0.19

0.23

0.11

Max Conseq. Winners

7

8

7

Max Conseq. Losers

9

10

5

 

 

Hedged by SPY 100 stocks:

 

Net Profit/Loss

24,290.54

23,623.01

667.54

Total Profit

125,820.11

81,115.72

44,704.39

Total Loss

-101,529.57

-57,492.71

-44,036.86

Cumulated Profit %

24.29 %

23.62 %

.67 %

Max Drawdown

-6,023.01

-3,452.13

-7,171.01

Max Drawdown %

-4.84 %

-2.72 %

-6.68 %

Max Drawdown Date

1/23/2013

12/20/2013

10/28/2013

Return/Drawdown Ratio

4.03

6.84

0.09

Drawdown Days %

72.92 %

75.30 %

86.56 %

Max Drawdown Duration

139

100

301

CAGR

11.82 %

11.51 %

.34 %

Sharpe Ratio

1.83

2.16

0.07

Annualized Volatility

6.47

5.32

4.93

Sortino Ratio

3.13

4.17

0.10

UPI

0.46

0.79

0.01

Information Ratio

1.63

1.97

0.07

Optimal f

28.21

40.61

1.41

All Trades #

838

503

335

Profitable Trades Ratio

0.52

0.54

0.49

Winning Trades #

433

270

163

Losing Trades #

405

233

172

Average Trade

28.99

46.96

1.99

Average Winning Trade

290.58

300.43

274.26

Average Losing Trade

-250.69

-246.75

-256.03

Avg. Win/ Avg. Loss Ratio

1.16

1.22

1.07

Average Profit per Share

0.14

0.22

0.01

Max Conseq. Winners

8

9

6

Max Conseq. Losers

7

8

6

Beta neutral 100 stocks

 

Net Profit/Loss

21,602.58

22,202.86

-600.28

Total Profit

121,110.75

77,638.42

43,472.33

Total Loss

-99,508.17

-55,435.57

-44,072.61

Cumulated Profit %

21.60 %

22.20 %

-.60 %

Max Drawdown

-5,886.81

-3,471.30

-7,440.96

Max Drawdown %

-4.82 %

-2.76 %

-6.99 %

Max Drawdown Date

1/23/2013

12/20/2013

10/28/2013

Return/Drawdown Ratio

3.67

6.40

-0.08

Drawdown Days %

49.12 %

50.88 %

59.00 %

Max Drawdown Duration

139

100

301

CAGR

7.12 %

7.31 %

-.21 %

Sharpe Ratio

1.33

1.68

-0.05

Annualized Volatility

5.34

4.35

4.12

Sortino Ratio

2.26

3.21

-0.07

UPI

0.32

0.59

0.00

Information Ratio

1.22

1.56

-0.05

Optimal f

24.98

38.58

-1.25

All Trades #

823

490

333

Profitable Trades Ratio

0.52

0.54

0.47

Winning Trades #

425

267

158

Losing Trades #

398

223

175

Average Trade

26.25

45.31

-1.80

Average Winning Trade

284.97

290.78

275.14

Average Losing Trade

-250.02

-248.59

-251.84

Avg. Win/ Avg. Loss Ratio

1.14

1.17

1.09

Average Profit per Share

0.13

0.22

-0.01

Max Conseq. Winners

7

9

6

Max Conseq. Losers

7

8

7

Only 200 stocks from S&P500:

 

Net Profit/Loss

42,221.01

35,965.79

6,255.22

Total Profit

211,465.74

148,821.21

62,644.53

Total Loss

-169,244.74

-112,855.42

-56,389.31

Cumulated Profit %

42.22 %

35.97 %

6.26 %

Max Drawdown

-6,847.01

-5,999.18

-6,399.88

Max Drawdown %

-4.87 %

-4.60 %

-5.73 %

Max Drawdown Date

3/19/2013

2/20/2013

5/21/2013

Return/Drawdown Ratio

6.17

6.00

0.98

Drawdown Days %

80.43 %

82.21 %

87.15 %

Max Drawdown Duration

78

109

299

CAGR

19.84 %

17.10 %

3.17 %

Sharpe Ratio

2.19

2.09

0.55

Annualized Volatility

9.06

8.18

5.72

Sortino Ratio

3.90

3.90

0.87

UPI

0.64

0.62

0.07

Information Ratio

1.87

1.85

0.53

Optimal f

24.20

25.58

9.69

All Trades #

1148

841

307

Profitable Trades Ratio

0.53

0.54

0.50

Winning Trades #

607

453

154

Losing Trades #

541

388

153

Average Trade

36.78

42.77

20.38

Average Winning Trade

348.38

328.52

406.78

Average Losing Trade

-312.84

-290.86

-368.56

Avg. Win/ Avg. Loss Ratio

1.11

1.13

1.10

Average Profit per Share

0.15

0.18

0.09

Max Conseq. Winners

10

9

5

Max Conseq. Losers

8

8

5

 

 

Hedged by SPY 200 stocks:

 

Net Profit/Loss

34,195.22

35,888.21

-1,692.99

Total Profit

219,339.25

149,819.75

69,519.49

Total Loss

-185,144.03

-113,931.54

-71,212.48

Cumulated Profit %

34.20 %

35.89 %

-1.69 %

Max Drawdown

-6,567.76

-5,997.23

-9,581.66

Max Drawdown %

-4.73 %

-4.60 %

-8.91 %

Max Drawdown Date

11/27/2013

2/20/2013

11/8/2013

Return/Drawdown Ratio

5.21

5.98

-0.18

Drawdown Days %

82.61 %

83.99 %

92.29 %

Max Drawdown Duration

133

109

299

CAGR

16.31 %

17.07 %

-.87 %

Sharpe Ratio

1.88

2.09

-0.14

Annualized Volatility

8.66

8.18

6.47

Sortino Ratio

3.14

3.89

-0.19

UPI

0.46

0.62

-0.01

Information Ratio

1.62

1.85

-0.13

Optimal f

21.77

25.53

-2.09

All Trades #

1389

892

497

Profitable Trades Ratio

0.52

0.54

0.48

Winning Trades #

718

479

239

Losing Trades #

671

413

258

Average Trade

24.62

40.23

-3.41

Average Winning Trade

305.49

312.78

290.88

Average Losing Trade

-275.92

-275.86

-276.02

Avg. Win/ Avg. Loss Ratio

1.11

1.13

1.05

Average Profit per Share

0.11

0.17

-0.02

Max Conseq. Winners

8

9

7

Max Conseq. Losers

8

8

6

 

 

Beta neutral 200 stocks:

 

Net Profit/Loss

28,497.21

33,793.76

-5,296.55

Total Profit

207,103.44

141,269.44

65,834.00

Total Loss

-178,606.22

-107,475.67

-71,130.55

Cumulated Profit %

28.50 %

33.79 %

-5.30 %

Max Drawdown

-6,992.91

-5,998.04

-10,306.36

Max Drawdown %

-5.23 %

-4.68 %

-9.85 %

Max Drawdown Date

11/29/2013

2/20/2013

11/8/2013

Return/Drawdown Ratio

4.08

5.63

-0.51

Drawdown Days %

55.37 %

56.46 %

62.86 %

Max Drawdown Duration

133

109

299

CAGR

9.27 %

10.85 %

-1.91 %

Sharpe Ratio

1.33

1.64

-0.34

Annualized Volatility

6.99

6.61

5.55

Sortino Ratio

2.14

3.07

-0.47

UPI

0.30

0.47

-0.03

Information Ratio

1.18

1.48

-0.34

Optimal f

19.01

24.81

-6.19

All Trades #

1344

853

491

Profitable Trades Ratio

0.52

0.54

0.47

Winning Trades #

693

460

233

Losing Trades #

651

393

258

Average Trade

21.20

39.62

-10.79

Average Winning Trade

298.85

307.11

282.55

Average Losing Trade

-274.36

-273.47

-275.70

Avg. Win/ Avg. Loss Ratio

1.09

1.12

1.02

Average Profit per Share

0.09

0.17

-0.05

Max Conseq. Winners

7

9

7

Max Conseq. Losers

8

8

6

 

Tactical Equity Allocation Using Conference Call Sentiment Indicators

THEORETICAL BACKGROUND 

The dialogue between management teams and Wall Street analysts on earnings conference calls is an important tool for information dissemination from asymmetrically informed management teams to the investing public.  This data point is primarily used by fundamental analysts to understand the current issues concerning a public company’s performance.  However, the linguistic content of these dialogues can also provide valuable quantitative data points if the market is not fully efficient in immediately digesting positive and negative stories.  Route 3 Capital and its predecessor firm, HudsonView Capital Management, have worked to prove this is the case, by quantifying and employing sentiment measures from these conference calls to predict security returns.

Sentiment Average Construction 

Route 3 Capital uses proprietary measures of conference call sentiment to systematically guide short to medium term tactical equity allocation for managed account clients.  To this end, the firm maintains short and medium term moving averages of sentiment for industry ETFs using weighted sentiment scores of constituent company conference call dialogues.  The following chart shows clear delineation in next day returns (morning to morning) in four beta driven industry ETFs by percentile of the sentiment averages:

Average Next Day ETF Returns by Sentiment Score Percentile

   

TACTICAL ETF STRATEGY BACKTEST

In November 2012, Route 3 began live trading its Tactical ETF Strategy.  The model is systematic, using the sentiment averages to determine a long, short, or neutral position in each ETF each trading day.   Route 3 used minute bar pricing data from TickData, adjusted for dividends, and the Deltix QuantOffice strategy development environment utilizing TimeBase’s integrated message bus to backtest the strategy from Jan 1, 2007 through the present.  The risk adjusted returns are encouraging and, with a negative 21% monthly correlation to the S&P 500, show particular value as an equity hedge or short-bias strategy:

Tactical ETF Strategy: Backtested Model Time Series (1/1/2007 – 1/31/2014),  $10m starting equity)

 

Tactical ETF Strategy: Backtested Monthly Returns (1/1/2007 – 1/31/2014)

 

 

Tactical ETF Strategy: Backtested Summary Performance Data (1/1/2007 –1/31/2014)

 

 

Principal- Joseph Graham, CFA

Joe currently operates Route 3 Capital and is a Senior Risk Officer at LibertyView Capital Management.  He most recently founded HudsonView Capital Management, which developed quantitative testing systems and research related to linguistic signals.  The company used this research to manage systematic long/short strategies for a prominent Geneva-based family office.  Prior to HudsonView, Joe was part of the SPAC portfolio management team at Millennium Partners.  Joe’s team was one of the largest SPAC common and warrant investors from 2008 to 2010.  Prior to Millennium, Joe was an Analyst and Portfolio Manager at LibertyView in the equity group, focusing on private placements, merger arbitrage, and SPACs.  He has an MBA with honors from the Wharton School of Business at the University of Pennsylvania and graduated summa cum laude with majors in Finance and Philosophy from Washington University in St. Louis.

Contact info:

Email: jgraham@route3capital.com

Phone: 646-660-3167